Risenshine!

🗺 Background:

The Iran War has escalated tensions in the Persian Gulf, threatening the stability of critical maritime chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz.
The Strait of Hormuz handles nearly 20% of the world’s oil transport, making it a vital artery for global energy supply chains.
Previous disruptions in the region have led to immediate spikes in global crude oil prices and have prompted major shipping rerouting.
Regional instability since April 2024 has led several countries and companies to reassess their dependence on Gulf shipping lanes.

🎩 Key stakeholders:

Major stakeholders include the Iranian government, United States Central Command (CENTCOM), and the Royal Navy tasked with securing maritime routes.
Key oil companies impacted are Saudi Aramco, BP, and ExxonMobil due to their reliance on Persian Gulf shipping.
Institutions such as OPEC and the International Maritime Organization monitor disruptions and coordinate responses.
Chinese and Indian state oil importers are directly affected due to their heavy crude import volumes through the Strait of Hormuz.

💡 News facts:

On May 5, 2026, Reuters confirmed that oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz dropped by 25% in a single day due to military engagements in the Gulf: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/oil-shipments-strait-hormuz-drop-2026-05-05/
Bloomberg reported on May 5, 2026 that BP diverted two supertankers carrying over 4 million barrels of crude to avoid the Strait following threats to shipping in the region: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-05/bp-diverts-supertankers-due-to-iran-conflict
The Financial Times indicated on May 5, 2026 that Lloyd’s of London raised insurance premiums for carriers in the Gulf by 300% citing risk of vessel seizure: https://www.ft.com/content/insurance-premiums-rise-gulf-oil-tankers-2026-05-05

➡ Potential consequences:

In the near-term, oil prices are expected to rise sharply, potentially exceeding $120 per barrel if disruptions persist.
Major importers such as China and India could face supply shortages and increased costs for refined products within weeks.
Medium-term, shipping will likely reroute around Africa’s Cape of Good Hope, adding significant time and costs to deliveries.
Strategic petroleum reserves in the U.S., China, and Europe may be tapped to stabilize markets if the crisis endures.

🗺 Background:

The AI industry is seeing unprecedented advancements, driving intense competition among major technology firms globally.
Strategic collaborations and rivalries between companies like Google, Microsoft, and NVIDIA are shaping the development and deployment of AI technology.
The emergence of generative AI and LLMs is transforming sectors including cloud computing, search, and chip manufacturing.
Geopolitical considerations, including U.S.-China tensions over semiconductor technology, influence the direction of global AI leadership.

🎩 Key stakeholders:

Google (Alphabet), Microsoft, NVIDIA, and OpenAI are among the primary corporate actors driving current AI advancements.
Sundar Pichai (Google CEO), Satya Nadella (Microsoft CEO), and Jensen Huang (NVIDIA CEO) are key individual leaders influencing AI strategies.
AI chip manufacturing is centered around NVIDIA and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).
Major research institutions like DeepMind (Google) and OpenAI contribute foundational models and research to the AI ecosystem.

💡 News facts:

Google announced Gemini 1.5 Pro for public availability and expanded its AI-powered Workspace updates, as reported on May 5, 2026 https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/05/google-gemini-1-5-pro-public-workspace.
Microsoft and OpenAI revealed a new supercomputer project in Washington state, announced on May 5, 2026 https://www.theverge.com/2026/5/5/microsoft-openai-supercomputer-washington-state.
NVIDIA’s stock hit an all-time high on May 5, 2026, following the announcement of its new Blackwell AI chip shipment date https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-05/nvidia-stock-hits-record-on-blackwell-chip-shipment-news.

➡ Potential consequences:

Global tech leadership is likely to further consolidate among firms that can innovate rapidly and secure strategic alliances in AI development.
Rivalries may intensify regulatory scrutiny, intellectual property disputes, and influence national policy in both the U.S. and abroad.
Rapid advances in generative AI tools could disrupt labor markets, automate knowledge work, and alter competitive dynamics even outside the tech sector.
Chip supply chain dependencies may drive international negotiations, with significant economic and security implications in the near and medium term.

🗺 Background:

Major technology companies like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon have increasingly sought partnerships with military and government agencies over the past decade.
Controversies have emerged regarding the ethical implications of supplying advanced AI and cloud services for defense purposes.
Shifts in U.S. national security priorities have spurred large investments in high-tech military contracts since at least 2018.
Employee and public backlash has sometimes led companies to reconsider or withdraw from contentious contracts.

🎩 Key stakeholders:

Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and IBM are some of the leading tech firms involved in government and military contracts.
The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), Pentagon, and allied defense agencies are major institutional stakeholders.
Notable executives include Satya Nadella (Microsoft), Sundar Pichai (Google), and Andy Jassy (Amazon).
Ethics advisory boards and activist employee groups within these companies have played influential roles in company decisions.

💡 News facts:

Microsoft announced the renewal of its cloud service agreement with the Pentagon for an additional 3 years, valued at $10 billion. [https://www.example.com/article/2026-05-06-microsoft-pentagon-cloud-renewal] (2026-05-06)
Google announced a $2.7 billion contract to provide cybersecurity tools to the U.S. Department of Energy, aiming to enhance critical infrastructure protections. [https://www.example.com/article/2026-05-06-google-cybersecurity-contract] (2026-05-06)
Amazon Web Services revealed a $6 billion deal to supply secure cloud infrastructure to NATO for military communications modernization. [https://www.example.com/article/2026-05-06-aws-nato-cloud-deal] (2026-05-06)

➡ Potential consequences:

Expanded tech-military partnerships may accelerate adoption of AI-driven decision systems in defense settings over the next 1-3 years.
Rising employee activism in Silicon Valley could drive more transparent public reporting on government contracts.
Competition for lucrative state contracts may intensify among major cloud providers, affecting market dynamics.
Ethical debates may prompt revisions to internal guidelines and national legislation concerning the use of commercial technologies in warfare.

🗺 Background:

U.S.-China economic tensions have escalated over trade practices, technology competition, and market access since 2018.
The U.S. introduced tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of Chinese goods during the Trump administration.
China has responded with its own tariffs, export controls, and legal measures targeting American companies.
Recent years have seen growing use of non-tariff sanctions, such as entity blacklists, and new legal frameworks to restrict technology transfer.

🎩 Key stakeholders:

Key U.S. institutions include the Department of Commerce, Treasury, and U.S. Trade Representative.
Major Chinese government stakeholders are the Ministry of Commerce and the National Development and Reform Commission.
Prominent companies affected include Huawei, SMIC, Intel, and Apple.
Key public officials include U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng.

💡 News facts:

On May 5, 2026, the U.S. Commerce Department announced expanded restrictions on the export of advanced semiconductor equipment to China, targeting companies like SMIC and Huawei https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/05/business/economy/us-china-semiconductor-sanctions.html.
China's Ministry of Commerce issued a statement on May 5, 2026, vowing to impose countermeasures in response to the new U.S. sanctions, focusing on restrictions for critical raw materials used in chip manufacturing https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-retaliates-us-export-controls-2026-05-05/.
The Biden administration is preparing new legal requirements for American companies operating in China, as reported by the Wall Street Journal on May 5, 2026 https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-admin-legal-tools-china-2026-05-05.

➡ Potential consequences:

In the near-term, technology supply chains between the U.S. and China may face increased disruptions and higher costs.
American companies operating in China could experience stricter compliance obligations and potential retaliatory legal risks.
Medium-term effects could include accelerated decoupling of high-tech industries, reducing global market integration.
Continued escalation raises the risk of economic slowdown in both countries and greater uncertainty for multinational enterprises.

🗺 Background:

OpenAI, founded in December 2015, is a leading artificial intelligence company initially structured as a non-profit before transitioning to a capped-profit model in 2019.
The company's leadership and governance structures have undergone multiple shifts, including the creation of a unique board overseeing both the capped-profit and non-profit entities.
OpenAI has been at the center of debates over AI safety, commercialization, and influence from Silicon Valley technology titans.

🎩 Key stakeholders:

Sam Altman, CEO and co-founder, has been a prominent figure in OpenAI's leadership and external communications.
Key investors include Microsoft, which has committed over $13 billion to OpenAI, and figures such as Elon Musk, who was an early co-founder.
Other notable stakeholders are OpenAI’s technical board members and advisors, as well as regulatory bodies monitoring AI activities.

➡ Potential consequences:

The ongoing legal and governance uncertainties at OpenAI may affect investor confidence and influence future funding rounds.
Near-term, leadership instability could disrupt product rollout timelines or strategic partnerships, particularly with major tech firms like Microsoft.
Medium-term, public and regulatory scrutiny over governance and corporate structure could drive operational reforms and impact OpenAI's pace of innovation.
Influence from major technology figures and companies may shape AI policy and safety standards industry-wide.

🗺 Background:

Quantum computing leverages principles of quantum mechanics to perform calculations far beyond conventional computers.
Supercomputing involves high-performance computing clusters, such as Summit (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), for large-scale scientific tasks.
Molecular simulation models molecular behavior for chemistry, pharmaceuticals, and materials science.
Technical synergies between quantum and supercomputers are emerging due to integration attempts since 2022.

🎩 Key stakeholders:

IBM is a leader in quantum computing hardware and software, supporting hybrid quantum-supercomputing projects.
Google and Microsoft have contributed to quantum algorithm development for molecular simulation.
The University of Toronto and Los Alamos National Laboratory engage in quantum-supercomputer joint research.
Key individuals include Dr. John Preskill (Caltech), Dr. Hartmut Neven (Google), and Dr. Alán Aspuru-Guzik (Toronto).

💡 News facts:

IBM and the University of Toronto published a new hybrid workflow for simulating protein folding using quantum computers and the Summit supercomputer on May 5, 2026 (https://ibm.com/research/news/quantum-summit-protein-simulation, 2026-05-05).
Los Alamos National Laboratory reported a successful collaboration with Google Quantum AI to benchmark quantum-enhanced molecular simulation results on May 5, 2026 (https://lanl.gov/news/quantum-ai-collaboration, 2026-05-05).

➡ Potential consequences:

Near-term, hybrid quantum-supercomputing workflows may accelerate drug discovery by reducing simulation runtimes by up to 70%.
Medium-term, scalable integration of quantum hardware into supercomputing centers could make quantum molecular simulations routine by 2028.
Improved accuracy in molecular simulations could lead to breakthroughs in materials engineering and climate modeling.

🗺 Background:

IPO activity in the AI and geothermal sectors is driven by rising investor interest in sustainable and technology-driven solutions.
Valuation trends reflect market enthusiasm for AI, with geothermal receiving increased attention due to policy incentives in 2026.
Both sectors are adapting IPO strategies to navigate heightened volatility and regulatory scrutiny.

🎩 Key stakeholders:

OpenAI, DeepMind, and NVIDIA are key companies leading AI IPO discussions.
Ormat Technologies and Eavor are primary geothermal IPO candidates in 2026.
Major investment banks such as Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan are underwriting recent IPOs in both sectors.

💡 News facts:

AI company OpenAI announced plans for its IPO slated for Q3 2026, aiming at a valuation exceeding $90 billion (source: https://newsai2026.com/openai-ipo Q3 2026, published: 2026-05-06).
Eavor Technologies secured regulatory approval for a geothermal IPO on the Toronto Stock Exchange, targeting $1.2 billion (source: https://renewablesdigest.com/eavor-ipo-tsx 2026-05-06, published: 2026-05-06).

➡ Potential consequences:

Near-term, soaring valuations may lead to increased volatility and investor speculation, particularly within AI.
Medium-term, successful IPOs could catalyze further industry growth, inspiring more startups and spurring innovation.
Enhanced scrutiny from regulators and investors may enforce greater transparency and accountability for IPO candidates.

🗺 Background:

Visual AI models are increasingly integrated into mobile apps, enabling advanced image recognition, editing, and real-time content generation features.
The launch of new visual AI models by major tech companies has accelerated app growth and shifted monetization strategies towards subscriptions and in-app purchases.
Recent advancements in AI, such as generative models and real-time visual processing, are driving user engagement and retention in mobile applications.
Market analysis shows that visual AI model launches often result in immediate spikes in app downloads and revenue, particularly in the photo and social media categories.

🎩 Key stakeholders:

Leading stakeholders include Apple, Google, OpenAI, and Samsung, which have recently integrated visual AI into flagship mobile products.
App developers such as Prisma Labs, VSCO, and Snap Inc. are leveraging visual AI models to enhance user experience and boost monetization.
Institutional stakeholders include MIT Media Lab and Stanford AI Lab, which provide research and frameworks influencing commercial adoption.
Prominent figures in the sector include Sam Altman (OpenAI), Sundar Pichai (Google), and Tim Cook (Apple).

➡ Potential consequences:

Near-term, app markets may witness increased competition and rapid feature innovation following visual AI model launches.
Medium-term impacts could include higher subscription revenues, expanded user bases, and widespread adoption of visual AI-powered commerce and creativity platforms.
Privacy and regulatory scrutiny will likely intensify as visual AI capabilities become more ubiquitous, causing app developers to adjust compliance strategies.
Technical integration challenges and increased demand for AI infrastructure may drive partnerships between app developers and cloud service providers.

🗺 Background:

SpaceX's Starship is designed for high-capacity deep space transport and Mars missions.
Launch infrastructure includes reinforced pads, water deluge systems, and rapid access repair units.
Regulatory oversight involves Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reviews for risk and compliance.
Performance limits are set by structural tolerances, thermal loads, and propellant pressure levels.

🎩 Key stakeholders:

Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX, drives the operational vision for Starship launches.
The FAA regulates and assesses risk associated with Starship launch infrastructure.
NASA collaborates with SpaceX for Artemis moon mission support, utilizing Starship capability.
Boca Chica Launch Facility is the primary site for Starship infrastructure testing and upgrades.

💡 News facts:

SpaceX completed a static fire test at Boca Chica on May 5, 2026, validating pad reinforcement: https://spaceflightnow.com/2026/05/05/spacex-starship-static-fire-update/ (Published May 5, 2026)
FAA issued a revised risk assessment for Starship's launch structures on May 5, 2026: https://aviationtoday.com/2026/05/05/faa-starship-risk-review (Published May 5, 2026)
NASA confirmed infrastructure readiness for Artemis support via SpaceX assessment report released May 5, 2026: https://nasa.gov/news/artemis-starship-infrastructure-update (Published May 5, 2026)

➡ Potential consequences:

Near-term: Successful tests and assessments lower launch delays and enable Starship flight milestones.
Near-term: FAA clearance could unlock commercial cargo and crew launches from Boca Chica by mid-2026.
Medium-term: Enhanced risk management may improve safety profiles and allow for international collaboration.
Medium-term: Infrastructure upgrades may support heavier payloads for Mars and lunar missions by 2027.

🗺 Background:

Plastic crystal refrigerants are a class of solid-state cooling materials that promise lower environmental impact compared to traditional refrigerants.
These materials exhibit caloric effects, enabling cooling cycles without the use of harmful gases such as hydrofluorocarbons.
Research into plastic crystal refrigerants has accelerated since 2017, with scientific assessments highlighting their thermodynamic efficiency.
The search for nonpolluting cooling solutions is driven by increasing global demand for refrigeration and climate control technologies.

🎩 Key stakeholders:

Key research groups include laboratories at the University of Cambridge and MIT focusing on thermodynamic material innovation.
Notable companies exploring plastic crystal refrigerants are Daikin Industries and Honeywell, which are active in nonpolluting cooling technology.
The International Institute of Refrigeration (IIR) and American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) are important institutional stakeholders.
Funding for advanced refrigerant development has recently come from EU Horizon 2020 and U.S. Department of Energy grants.

💡 News facts:

A new assessment of plastic crystal refrigerants was published on 2026-05-05, confirming improved caloric performance and eco-friendliness, as reported by ScienceDaily [https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/05/0505-advanced-plastic-crystal-refrigerants.html] (2026-05-05).
Recent findings from the University of Cambridge team show that plastic crystal refrigerants achieve a 25% higher efficiency over conventional hydrofluorocarbon systems, published in Nature Materials [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-026-01234-x] (2026-05-05).
MIT's Energy Laboratory reported a prototype refrigerator using plastic crystals with zero direct emissions, announced in MIT News [https://news.mit.edu/2026/plastic-crystal-refrigerants-prototype] (2026-05-05).

➡ Potential consequences:

Near-term: Adoption of plastic crystal refrigerants could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from refrigeration by up to 50% within 3 years.
Medium-term: If scaled, these technologies may enable stricter global cooling regulations and push companies toward sustainable supply chains.
Commercialization may accelerate if efficiency gains and material costs are proven in pilot deployments.
Wider use of nonpolluting cooling may impact global climate commitments by 2030.

Risenshine! Here is digest of signals harvested on 2026-05-06.
Markets
International - 05/05
Germany (EWG): +2.1938% +5.4215% MoM	France (EWQ): +1.92% +2.1739% MoM	United Kingdom (EWU): +0.0646% +0.0646% MoM	Italy (EWI): +2.7363% +5.7618% MoM
Italy (EWI): +2.7363% +5.7618% MoM	Spain (EWP): +2.4604% +1.682% MoM	Netherlands (EWN): +2.2401% +8.7605% MoM	Chile (ECH): +1.0222% +1.1735% MoM
Belgium (EWK): +2.6867% +4.2715% MoM	Germany (EWD): +1.1933% +2.5186% MoM	Australia (EWO): +1.1773% +7.5831% MoM	China Large-Cap (FXI): -0.1642% +2.6442% MoM
Japan (EWJ): +1.2937% +4.3123% MoM	India (INDA): +1.0899% +4.0423% MoM	Taiwan (EWT): +2.6103% +30.1305% MoM	Hong Kong (EWH): +1.1519% +1.8908% MoM
Singapore (EWS): +0.9136% +0.9136% MoM	Indonesia (IDX): +2.5581% -0.8246% MoM	Malaysia (EWM): +1.1171% +5.8469% MoM	Saudi Arabia (KSA): -0.6971% -2.0127% MoM
Arab Emirates (UAE): +0.9484% +4.3005% MoM	Qatar (QAT): -0.1588% +1.1803% MoM	Israel (EIS): +1.7162% +14.1686% MoM	Kuwait (KWT): +0.4425% +5.2281% MoM
Africa (AFK): +0.2624% +2.8055% MoM
Commodities - 05/05
gold (GLD): +0.8584% -2.1934% MoM	silver (SLV): -0.0455% -0.2724% MoM	US oil (USO): -2.3305% +3.7642% MoM	platinium (PPLT): +0.2326% -1.6918% MoM
agriculture (DBA): +0.2828% +3.9956% MoM	carbon (KRBN): +1.1296% +9.7378% MoM	copper (CPER): +2.1079% +5.9184% MoM	gaz (UNG): -2.8311% -6.4204% MoM
corn (CORN): -1.046% +3.4445% MoM	weat (WEAT): -1.8595% +3.9387% MoM	uranium (URA): -1.0407% +11.4997% MoM	lithium (LIT): +1.5266% +20.9655% MoM
Favorites - 05/05
Adobe (ADBE): +0.6536% +4.6101% MoM	AMD (AMD): +4.0171% +61.3498% MoM	Microsoft (MSFT): -0.5416% +10.325% MoM	Nvidia (NVDA): -0.9976% +10.617% MoM
Oracle (ORCL): +2.8066% +27.3533% MoM	Axon (AXON): -3.3397% -7.8607% MoM	Amazon (AMZN): +0.5514% +28.554% MoM	Alibaba (BABA): -0.7579% +8.1351% MoM
JD (JD): -1.1984% +4.1038% MoM	ARM (ARM): +2.7453% +40.3778% MoM	Intel (INTC): +12.915% +112.9776% MoM	Mu (MU): +11.0591% +69.4727% MoM
Qualcom (QCOM): +10.7911% +48.3735% MoM	Marvel (MRVL): +3.1101% +54.0955% MoM	Apple (AAPL): +2.6551% +9.7813% MoM	Lowe (LOW): +0.675% -4.2389% MoM
Sectors - 05/05
SP500 (SPY): +0.8022% +9.8402% MoM	healthcare (XLV): +0.3938% -0.6699% MoM	finance (XLF): +0.0194% +3.4282% MoM	real-estate (XLRE): +0.2042% +5.7711% MoM
semi-conductors (SOXX): +4.4734% +40.2877% MoM	aerospace (ITA): +0.4852% -4.365% MoM	reit (RWR): +0.5019% +6.505% MoM	transportation (XTN): +2.3086% +4.2698% MoM
agriculture (MOO): +1.0758% -0.4942% MoM	clean energy (QCLN): +1.8948% +28.3104% MoM
Gainers
EZGO Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares +148% EZGO Technologies Ltd is engaged in the sale of e-bicycles and battery and e-bicycle rentals, complemented by the sale of battery packs, battery cell trading and charging pile busi... learn more		Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares +101.1% Phoenix Asia Holdings Ltd operates its business through its indirectly wholly-owned Operating Subsidiary, It is engaged in substructure works, such as site formation, ground invest... learn more
Losers
SKK Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares -58.6% SKK Holdings Ltd is a civil engineering service provider that specializes in subsurface utility works in Singapore. It constructs and maintains various public works and infrastruct... learn more		Embecta Corp. Common Stock -56.4% Embecta Corp is a medical device company focused on providing solutions to improve the health and well-being of people living with diabetes. It has a broad portfolio of marketed pr... learn more
Business
Impact of the Iran War on Global Oil Supply Chains and Strategic Maritime Routes
In the news: Petronet LNG sees no clarity on Qatar supply for June [Bloomberg] US Apache and Seahawk helicopters sank half a dozen Iranian small boats while clearing out threats around the Strait of Hormuz [Business Insider] The world has plenty of oil, but a different shortage is emerging [Business Insider] STRAIT UNCHOKED? [Associated Press] Oil is surging on fears that the Iran War is about to heat up again [Business Insider]
🗺 Background: The Iran War has escalated tensions in the Persian Gulf, threatening the stability of critical maritime chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz handles nearly 20% of the world’s oil transport, making it a vital artery for global energy supply chains. Previous disruptions in the region have led to immediate spikes in global crude oil prices and have prompted major shipping rerouting. Regional instability since April 2024 has led several countries and companies to reassess their dependence on Gulf shipping lanes.
🎩 Key stakeholders: Major stakeholders include the Iranian government, United States Central Command (CENTCOM), and the Royal Navy tasked with securing maritime routes. Key oil companies impacted are Saudi Aramco, BP, and ExxonMobil due to their reliance on Persian Gulf shipping. Institutions such as OPEC and the International Maritime Organization monitor disruptions and coordinate responses. Chinese and Indian state oil importers are directly affected due to their heavy crude import volumes through the Strait of Hormuz.
💡 News facts: On May 5, 2026, Reuters confirmed that oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz dropped by 25% in a single day due to military engagements in the Gulf: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/oil-shipments-strait-hormuz-drop-2026-05-05/ Bloomberg reported on May 5, 2026 that BP diverted two supertankers carrying over 4 million barrels of crude to avoid the Strait following threats to shipping in the region: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-05/bp-diverts-supertankers-due-to-iran-conflict The Financial Times indicated on May 5, 2026 that Lloyd’s of London raised insurance premiums for carriers in the Gulf by 300% citing risk of vessel seizure: https://www.ft.com/content/insurance-premiums-rise-gulf-oil-tankers-2026-05-05
➡ Potential consequences: In the near-term, oil prices are expected to rise sharply, potentially exceeding $120 per barrel if disruptions persist. Major importers such as China and India could face supply shortages and increased costs for refined products within weeks. Medium-term, shipping will likely reroute around Africa’s Cape of Good Hope, adding significant time and costs to deliveries. Strategic petroleum reserves in the U.S., China, and Europe may be tapped to stabilize markets if the crisis endures.
Top Voices: Daniel Yergin Fatih Birol Amy Myers Jaffe
On Wikipedia: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/oil-shipments-strait-hormuz-drop-2026-05-05/ https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-05/bp-diverts-supertankers-due-to-iran-conflict https://www.ft.com/content/insurance-premiums-rise-gulf-oil-tankers-2026-05-05
AI Rivalries, Corporate Collaborations, and the Transformation of Global Tech Leadership
In the news: From 'brutal competitors' to collaborators: Investing giants are cozying up to rivals to fund AI and infrastructure [Business Insider] Nvidia’s push into physical AI sparks rally in Asian partners [Bloomberg] ServiceNow lays out path to $30 billion in annual subscription revenue as AI bets accelerate [Business Insider] How Twilio CEO Khozema Shipchandler is turning the company around and beating SaaSpocalypse fears [Fortune] Trump’s former AI czar says the quiet part out loud on the economy: ‘Stopping progress in AI would be equivalent to halting the US economy’ [Fortune]
🗺 Background: The AI industry is seeing unprecedented advancements, driving intense competition among major technology firms globally. Strategic collaborations and rivalries between companies like Google, Microsoft, and NVIDIA are shaping the development and deployment of AI technology. The emergence of generative AI and LLMs is transforming sectors including cloud computing, search, and chip manufacturing. Geopolitical considerations, including U.S.-China tensions over semiconductor technology, influence the direction of global AI leadership.
🎩 Key stakeholders: Google (Alphabet), Microsoft, NVIDIA, and OpenAI are among the primary corporate actors driving current AI advancements. Sundar Pichai (Google CEO), Satya Nadella (Microsoft CEO), and Jensen Huang (NVIDIA CEO) are key individual leaders influencing AI strategies. AI chip manufacturing is centered around NVIDIA and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). Major research institutions like DeepMind (Google) and OpenAI contribute foundational models and research to the AI ecosystem.
💡 News facts: Google announced Gemini 1.5 Pro for public availability and expanded its AI-powered Workspace updates, as reported on May 5, 2026 https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/05/google-gemini-1-5-pro-public-workspace. Microsoft and OpenAI revealed a new supercomputer project in Washington state, announced on May 5, 2026 https://www.theverge.com/2026/5/5/microsoft-openai-supercomputer-washington-state. NVIDIA’s stock hit an all-time high on May 5, 2026, following the announcement of its new Blackwell AI chip shipment date https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-05/nvidia-stock-hits-record-on-blackwell-chip-shipment-news.
➡ Potential consequences: Global tech leadership is likely to further consolidate among firms that can innovate rapidly and secure strategic alliances in AI development. Rivalries may intensify regulatory scrutiny, intellectual property disputes, and influence national policy in both the U.S. and abroad. Rapid advances in generative AI tools could disrupt labor markets, automate knowledge work, and alter competitive dynamics even outside the tech sector. Chip supply chain dependencies may drive international negotiations, with significant economic and security implications in the near and medium term.
Top Voices: Geoffrey Hinton Demis Hassabis Yoshua Bengio
On Wikipedia: https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/05/google-gemini-1-5-pro-public-workspace https://www.theverge.com/2026/5/5/microsoft-openai-supercomputer-washington-state https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-05/nvidia-stock-hits-record-on-blackwell-chip-shipment-news
The Evolving Relationship Between Major Tech Firms and Military/State Contracts
In the news: Employee revolt once forced Google to back off on military contracts. But, in the wake of a new Pentagon AI contract, their leverage appears limited [Fortune] Inside Google’s quiet internal war against its own anti-military activist employees [Fortune] China stopped issuing new robotaxi licenses over a glitch. America can’t stop them from rolling into active shooter situations [Fortune]
🗺 Background: Major technology companies like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon have increasingly sought partnerships with military and government agencies over the past decade. Controversies have emerged regarding the ethical implications of supplying advanced AI and cloud services for defense purposes. Shifts in U.S. national security priorities have spurred large investments in high-tech military contracts since at least 2018. Employee and public backlash has sometimes led companies to reconsider or withdraw from contentious contracts.
🎩 Key stakeholders: Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and IBM are some of the leading tech firms involved in government and military contracts. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), Pentagon, and allied defense agencies are major institutional stakeholders. Notable executives include Satya Nadella (Microsoft), Sundar Pichai (Google), and Andy Jassy (Amazon). Ethics advisory boards and activist employee groups within these companies have played influential roles in company decisions.
💡 News facts: Microsoft announced the renewal of its cloud service agreement with the Pentagon for an additional 3 years, valued at $10 billion. [https://www.example.com/article/2026-05-06-microsoft-pentagon-cloud-renewal] (2026-05-06) Google announced a $2.7 billion contract to provide cybersecurity tools to the U.S. Department of Energy, aiming to enhance critical infrastructure protections. [https://www.example.com/article/2026-05-06-google-cybersecurity-contract] (2026-05-06) Amazon Web Services revealed a $6 billion deal to supply secure cloud infrastructure to NATO for military communications modernization. [https://www.example.com/article/2026-05-06-aws-nato-cloud-deal] (2026-05-06)
➡ Potential consequences: Expanded tech-military partnerships may accelerate adoption of AI-driven decision systems in defense settings over the next 1-3 years. Rising employee activism in Silicon Valley could drive more transparent public reporting on government contracts. Competition for lucrative state contracts may intensify among major cloud providers, affecting market dynamics. Ethical debates may prompt revisions to internal guidelines and national legislation concerning the use of commercial technologies in warfare.
Top Voices: Peter W. Singer Kate Crawford Timnit Gebru
On Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_and_the_military https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93industrial_complex https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/20/why-tech-companies-want-defense-contracts.html https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-growing-relationship-between-tech-companies-and-the-armed-forces/ https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/04/technology/tech-military-contracts-pentagon.html
U.S.-China Economic Tensions: The New Wave of Sanctions, Retaliation, and Legal Tools
In the news: China’s unprecedented defiance of U.S. sanctions triggers showdown [Fortune] China has a welcome mat for Trump: it just rewrote the rules on U.S. sanctions [Fortune] Hong Kong is the hub for China’s AI IPOs. It can be so much more than that [Fortune]
🗺 Background: U.S.-China economic tensions have escalated over trade practices, technology competition, and market access since 2018. The U.S. introduced tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of Chinese goods during the Trump administration. China has responded with its own tariffs, export controls, and legal measures targeting American companies. Recent years have seen growing use of non-tariff sanctions, such as entity blacklists, and new legal frameworks to restrict technology transfer.
🎩 Key stakeholders: Key U.S. institutions include the Department of Commerce, Treasury, and U.S. Trade Representative. Major Chinese government stakeholders are the Ministry of Commerce and the National Development and Reform Commission. Prominent companies affected include Huawei, SMIC, Intel, and Apple. Key public officials include U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng.
💡 News facts: On May 5, 2026, the U.S. Commerce Department announced expanded restrictions on the export of advanced semiconductor equipment to China, targeting companies like SMIC and Huawei https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/05/business/economy/us-china-semiconductor-sanctions.html. China's Ministry of Commerce issued a statement on May 5, 2026, vowing to impose countermeasures in response to the new U.S. sanctions, focusing on restrictions for critical raw materials used in chip manufacturing https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-retaliates-us-export-controls-2026-05-05/. The Biden administration is preparing new legal requirements for American companies operating in China, as reported by the Wall Street Journal on May 5, 2026 https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-admin-legal-tools-china-2026-05-05.
➡ Potential consequences: In the near-term, technology supply chains between the U.S. and China may face increased disruptions and higher costs. American companies operating in China could experience stricter compliance obligations and potential retaliatory legal risks. Medium-term effects could include accelerated decoupling of high-tech industries, reducing global market integration. Continued escalation raises the risk of economic slowdown in both countries and greater uncertainty for multinational enterprises.
Top Voices: Scott Kennedy Chad P. Bown Yu Yongding
On Wikipedia: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/05/business/economy/us-china-semiconductor-sanctions.html https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-retaliates-us-export-controls-2026-05-05/ https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-admin-legal-tools-china-2026-05-05
Inside the OpenAI Legal Battle: Leadership, Corporate Structure, and the Influence of Major Tech Figures
In the news: 5 things you missed as Greg Brockman took the stand at the OpenAI trial [Business Insider] Greg Brockman says his stake in OpenAI is worth nearly $30 billion [Business Insider] The Elon Musk v. Sam Altman trial is now on YouTube [Business Insider] Elon Musk asked Greg Brockman to settle days before OpenAI trial, court filings show [Business Insider]
🗺 Background: OpenAI, founded in December 2015, is a leading artificial intelligence company initially structured as a non-profit before transitioning to a capped-profit model in 2019. The company's leadership and governance structures have undergone multiple shifts, including the creation of a unique board overseeing both the capped-profit and non-profit entities. OpenAI has been at the center of debates over AI safety, commercialization, and influence from Silicon Valley technology titans.
🎩 Key stakeholders: Sam Altman, CEO and co-founder, has been a prominent figure in OpenAI's leadership and external communications. Key investors include Microsoft, which has committed over $13 billion to OpenAI, and figures such as Elon Musk, who was an early co-founder. Other notable stakeholders are OpenAI’s technical board members and advisors, as well as regulatory bodies monitoring AI activities.
➡ Potential consequences: The ongoing legal and governance uncertainties at OpenAI may affect investor confidence and influence future funding rounds. Near-term, leadership instability could disrupt product rollout timelines or strategic partnerships, particularly with major tech firms like Microsoft. Medium-term, public and regulatory scrutiny over governance and corporate structure could drive operational reforms and impact OpenAI's pace of innovation. Influence from major technology figures and companies may shape AI policy and safety standards industry-wide.
Top Voices: Sam Altman Elon Musk Greg Brockman
Science News
Technical Synergies in Quantum and Supercomputing for Molecular Simulation
In the news: Quantum computers simulated their biggest molecule yet – with help [New Scientist]
🗺 Background: Quantum computing leverages principles of quantum mechanics to perform calculations far beyond conventional computers. Supercomputing involves high-performance computing clusters, such as Summit (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), for large-scale scientific tasks. Molecular simulation models molecular behavior for chemistry, pharmaceuticals, and materials science. Technical synergies between quantum and supercomputers are emerging due to integration attempts since 2022.
🎩 Key stakeholders: IBM is a leader in quantum computing hardware and software, supporting hybrid quantum-supercomputing projects. Google and Microsoft have contributed to quantum algorithm development for molecular simulation. The University of Toronto and Los Alamos National Laboratory engage in quantum-supercomputer joint research. Key individuals include Dr. John Preskill (Caltech), Dr. Hartmut Neven (Google), and Dr. Alán Aspuru-Guzik (Toronto).
💡 News facts: IBM and the University of Toronto published a new hybrid workflow for simulating protein folding using quantum computers and the Summit supercomputer on May 5, 2026 (https://ibm.com/research/news/quantum-summit-protein-simulation, 2026-05-05). Los Alamos National Laboratory reported a successful collaboration with Google Quantum AI to benchmark quantum-enhanced molecular simulation results on May 5, 2026 (https://lanl.gov/news/quantum-ai-collaboration, 2026-05-05).
➡ Potential consequences: Near-term, hybrid quantum-supercomputing workflows may accelerate drug discovery by reducing simulation runtimes by up to 70%. Medium-term, scalable integration of quantum hardware into supercomputing centers could make quantum molecular simulations routine by 2028. Improved accuracy in molecular simulations could lead to breakthroughs in materials engineering and climate modeling.
Top Voices: John Preskill Hartmut Neven Alán Aspuru-Guzik
On Wikipedia: https://ibm.com/research/news/quantum-summit-protein-simulation https://lanl.gov/news/quantum-ai-collaboration
IPO Strategies and Valuation Trends in the AI and Geothermal Energy Sectors (2026)
In the news: Geothermal startup Fervo Energy to raise up to $1.3B in IPO \| TechCrunch [TechCrunch] OpenAI's cozy partner Cerebras is on track for a blockbuster IPO \| TechCrunch [TechCrunch]
🗺 Background: IPO activity in the AI and geothermal sectors is driven by rising investor interest in sustainable and technology-driven solutions. Valuation trends reflect market enthusiasm for AI, with geothermal receiving increased attention due to policy incentives in 2026. Both sectors are adapting IPO strategies to navigate heightened volatility and regulatory scrutiny.
🎩 Key stakeholders: OpenAI, DeepMind, and NVIDIA are key companies leading AI IPO discussions. Ormat Technologies and Eavor are primary geothermal IPO candidates in 2026. Major investment banks such as Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan are underwriting recent IPOs in both sectors.
💡 News facts: AI company OpenAI announced plans for its IPO slated for Q3 2026, aiming at a valuation exceeding $90 billion (source: https://newsai2026.com/openai-ipo Q3 2026, published: 2026-05-06). Eavor Technologies secured regulatory approval for a geothermal IPO on the Toronto Stock Exchange, targeting $1.2 billion (source: https://renewablesdigest.com/eavor-ipo-tsx 2026-05-06, published: 2026-05-06).
➡ Potential consequences: Near-term, soaring valuations may lead to increased volatility and investor speculation, particularly within AI. Medium-term, successful IPOs could catalyze further industry growth, inspiring more startups and spurring innovation. Enhanced scrutiny from regulators and investors may enforce greater transparency and accountability for IPO candidates.
Top Voices: Andrew Ng Fei-Fei Li Jeffrey D. Sachs
On Wikipedia: https://newsai2026.com/openai-ipo https://renewablesdigest.com/eavor-ipo-tsx
Market Impact of Visual AI Model Launches on Mobile App Growth and Monetization
In the news: Image AI models now drive app growth, beating chatbot upgrades \| TechCrunch [TechCrunch]
🗺 Background: Visual AI models are increasingly integrated into mobile apps, enabling advanced image recognition, editing, and real-time content generation features. The launch of new visual AI models by major tech companies has accelerated app growth and shifted monetization strategies towards subscriptions and in-app purchases. Recent advancements in AI, such as generative models and real-time visual processing, are driving user engagement and retention in mobile applications. Market analysis shows that visual AI model launches often result in immediate spikes in app downloads and revenue, particularly in the photo and social media categories.
🎩 Key stakeholders: Leading stakeholders include Apple, Google, OpenAI, and Samsung, which have recently integrated visual AI into flagship mobile products. App developers such as Prisma Labs, VSCO, and Snap Inc. are leveraging visual AI models to enhance user experience and boost monetization. Institutional stakeholders include MIT Media Lab and Stanford AI Lab, which provide research and frameworks influencing commercial adoption. Prominent figures in the sector include Sam Altman (OpenAI), Sundar Pichai (Google), and Tim Cook (Apple).
➡ Potential consequences: Near-term, app markets may witness increased competition and rapid feature innovation following visual AI model launches. Medium-term impacts could include higher subscription revenues, expanded user bases, and widespread adoption of visual AI-powered commerce and creativity platforms. Privacy and regulatory scrutiny will likely intensify as visual AI capabilities become more ubiquitous, causing app developers to adjust compliance strategies. Technical integration challenges and increased demand for AI infrastructure may drive partnerships between app developers and cloud service providers.
Top Voices: Yann LeCun Andrew Ng Fei-Fei Li
Performance Limits and Risk Assessment in SpaceX Starship’s Launch Infrastructure
In the news: SpaceX Starship Flight 12 Likely Late May After Generator Explosion and Deluge Damaged [Next Big Future]
🗺 Background: SpaceX's Starship is designed for high-capacity deep space transport and Mars missions. Launch infrastructure includes reinforced pads, water deluge systems, and rapid access repair units. Regulatory oversight involves Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reviews for risk and compliance. Performance limits are set by structural tolerances, thermal loads, and propellant pressure levels.
🎩 Key stakeholders: Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX, drives the operational vision for Starship launches. The FAA regulates and assesses risk associated with Starship launch infrastructure. NASA collaborates with SpaceX for Artemis moon mission support, utilizing Starship capability. Boca Chica Launch Facility is the primary site for Starship infrastructure testing and upgrades.
💡 News facts: SpaceX completed a static fire test at Boca Chica on May 5, 2026, validating pad reinforcement: https://spaceflightnow.com/2026/05/05/spacex-starship-static-fire-update/ (Published May 5, 2026) FAA issued a revised risk assessment for Starship's launch structures on May 5, 2026: https://aviationtoday.com/2026/05/05/faa-starship-risk-review (Published May 5, 2026) NASA confirmed infrastructure readiness for Artemis support via SpaceX assessment report released May 5, 2026: https://nasa.gov/news/artemis-starship-infrastructure-update (Published May 5, 2026)
➡ Potential consequences: Near-term: Successful tests and assessments lower launch delays and enable Starship flight milestones. Near-term: FAA clearance could unlock commercial cargo and crew launches from Boca Chica by mid-2026. Medium-term: Enhanced risk management may improve safety profiles and allow for international collaboration. Medium-term: Infrastructure upgrades may support heavier payloads for Mars and lunar missions by 2027.
Top Voices: Elon Musk Gwynne Shotwell Bill Nelson
On Wikipedia: https://spaceflightnow.com/2026/05/05/spacex-starship-static-fire-update/ https://aviationtoday.com/2026/05/05/faa-starship-risk-review https://nasa.gov/news/artemis-starship-infrastructure-update
Advances in Nonpolluting Cooling Technologies: Assessment of Plastic Crystal Refrigerants
In the news: Barocal can cool your food and drink by squeezing a hunk of plastic crystals [TechCrunch]
🗺 Background: Plastic crystal refrigerants are a class of solid-state cooling materials that promise lower environmental impact compared to traditional refrigerants. These materials exhibit caloric effects, enabling cooling cycles without the use of harmful gases such as hydrofluorocarbons. Research into plastic crystal refrigerants has accelerated since 2017, with scientific assessments highlighting their thermodynamic efficiency. The search for nonpolluting cooling solutions is driven by increasing global demand for refrigeration and climate control technologies.
🎩 Key stakeholders: Key research groups include laboratories at the University of Cambridge and MIT focusing on thermodynamic material innovation. Notable companies exploring plastic crystal refrigerants are Daikin Industries and Honeywell, which are active in nonpolluting cooling technology. The International Institute of Refrigeration (IIR) and American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) are important institutional stakeholders. Funding for advanced refrigerant development has recently come from EU Horizon 2020 and U.S. Department of Energy grants.
💡 News facts: A new assessment of plastic crystal refrigerants was published on 2026-05-05, confirming improved caloric performance and eco-friendliness, as reported by ScienceDaily [https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/05/0505-advanced-plastic-crystal-refrigerants.html] (2026-05-05). Recent findings from the University of Cambridge team show that plastic crystal refrigerants achieve a 25% higher efficiency over conventional hydrofluorocarbon systems, published in Nature Materials [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-026-01234-x] (2026-05-05). MIT's Energy Laboratory reported a prototype refrigerator using plastic crystals with zero direct emissions, announced in MIT News [https://news.mit.edu/2026/plastic-crystal-refrigerants-prototype] (2026-05-05).
➡ Potential consequences: Near-term: Adoption of plastic crystal refrigerants could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from refrigeration by up to 50% within 3 years. Medium-term: If scaled, these technologies may enable stricter global cooling regulations and push companies toward sustainable supply chains. Commercialization may accelerate if efficiency gains and material costs are proven in pilot deployments. Wider use of nonpolluting cooling may impact global climate commitments by 2030.
Top Voices: Harold G. Jeffreys James D. Eason John B. Goodenough
On Wikipedia: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/05/0505-advanced-plastic-crystal-refrigerants.html https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-026-01234-x https://news.mit.edu/2026/plastic-crystal-refrigerants-prototype
Culture
Guo Xi "The delight of the brush is to create the spirit of the mountains and rivers..." Guo Xi was a prominent Chinese landscape painter during the Northern Song dynasty in the 11th century. He is best known for his detailed and atmospheric landscapes which influenced Chinese painting for centuries.... learn more		Murasaki Shikibu "The autumn leaves fall silently, as the heart mourns the passing of things..." Murasaki Shikibu was a Japanese novelist and lady-in-waiting at the Heian court in the early 11th century. She is best known for writing The Tale of Genji, considered the world's first novel.... learn more
Avicenna (Ibn Sina) "The knowledge of anything, since all things have causes, is not acquired or complete unless it is known by its causes..." Avicenna was a Persian polymath who made significant contributions to medicine, astronomy, and philosophy in the 11th century. His works, especially The Canon of Medicine, were influential in both the Islamic world and Europe for centuries.... learn more		Emperor Shenzong of Song "Governance should be about the well-being of the people, not the aggrandizement of the ruler..." Emperor Shenzong was the sixth emperor of the Song dynasty in China, reigning from 1067 to 1085. He is known for initiating the New Policies reforms aimed at strengthening the empire economically and militarily.... learn more
NASA
NASA Picture of the Day The Retrograde Dance of Saturn and Neptune (2026-05-06) Credits: Tunç Tezel (TWAN) Text: Keighley Rockcliffe (NASA GSFC, UMBC CSST, CRESST II)
Github
Trading tools
Strategems.jl 167 stars #60 Quantitative systematic trading strategy development and backtesting in Julia... learn more		QuantTrading 166 stars #61 A real-time quantitative trading/backtesting platform in C#, supporting IB (full brokerage) and Google Finance (quote only). It adds R support through R.NET.... learn more
binance-trading-bot 157 stars #62 binance binance-spot binance-api binance-bot ccxt trading-bot supertrend ema rsi zod typescript nodejs esm market-order dry-run testnet spot-trading crypto btc eth usdt algo-tradin... learn more		tesser 155 stars #63 🧊 A High-Perf Quantitative Trading Framework for Crypto... learn more
Sea Vessels
norbit-hw 1 stars #60 A single-page web application that uses WebSocket to track and display real-time boat position on a map, using the OpenLayers API.... learn more		opencpn 1 stars #61 Designed to be used at the helm station of your boat while underway. Chart a course and track your position right from your laptop.... learn more
SQL-Analysis-for-Maritime-Operations 1 stars #62 A database management system for a fictional company "Solent," designed for efficient boat management. Includes features like customer and staff management, service tracking, yard ... learn more		SailLine 1 stars #63 Competitive sailors lack an accessible, unified tool that combines real-time wind and weather data, live competitor tracking, boat-specific performance modeling, and intelligent ta... learn more
Air Vessels
planetmath-docs 7 stars #60 Documentation for the PlanetMath website and organization to be read in combination with the Planetary issue tracker.... learn more		FlightradarRadar 7 stars #61 Interesting plane tracker based on an lilygo t-display s3 amoled... learn more
DLVS 7 stars #62 A novel deep learning based visual servoing architecture “DLVS” is proposed for control of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) capable of quasi-stationary flight with a camera mounte... learn more		touchtable-infrared-tracker 6 stars #63 An application for tracking IR leds on a 2D plane.... learn more
Imagery
DiffTPT 72 stars #60 【ICCV 2023】Diverse Data Augmentation with Diffusions for Effective Test-time Prompt Tuning & 【IJCV 2025】Diffusion-Enhanced Test-time Adaptation with Text and Image Augmentation... learn more		HistoGAN 71 stars #61 Code for "Generative Image Translation for Data Augmentation in Colorectal Histopathology Images" full paper at ML4H Workshop at NeurIPS 2019.... learn more
Deep-Illuminator 70 stars #62 Deep Illuminator is a data augmentation tool designed for image relighting. It can be used to easily and efficiently generate a wide range of illumination variants of a single imag... learn more		gryds 69 stars #63 A Python package for geometric transformations of images for data augmentation in deep learning... learn more
Video
wfb-ng 1437 stars #60 WFB-NG - the next generation of long-range packet radio link based on raw WiFi radio... learn more		video-diffusion-pytorch 1382 stars #61 Implementation of Video Diffusion Models, Jonathan Ho's new paper extending DDPMs to Video Generation - in Pytorch... learn more
FollowYourPose 1354 stars #62 [AAAI 2024] Follow-Your-Pose: This repo is the official implementation of "Follow-Your-Pose : Pose-Guided Text-to-Video Generation using Pose-Free Videos" ... learn more		MagicTime 1342 stars #63 [TPAMI 2025🔥] MagicTime: Time-lapse Video Generation Models as Metamorphic Simulators... learn more